Spine Traction in Scoliosis 9-23-2020
Question:
My child’s spine doctor says they want to use “traction” on my child’s spine. This sounds scary. What is it? Is this something new? I have never heard of it.
Answer:
Spine traction to correct spinal deformity is not a new
concept; in fact, the first applications were reported in ancient Hindu mythological
epics (3500-1800 BC)(Kumar K.: Spinal
deformity and axial traction. Spine
21:653-656, 1996). Hippocrates (c. 460 BC – 380 BC) could be considered the
first to study the spine and spinal deformity, and introduced the terms
“scoliosis” and “kyphosis”. He invented the Hippocrates Bench or Board through
which the patient’s spine was stretched, while awake, to help with their spinal
deformity. The traction was applied by
pulling on the head and neck on one end, and pulling down through the legs on
the other end. A winch would gradually
increase the stretch on the spine, then a practitioner could then push on the
spine to induce a corrective force to the chest and spine.
Traction for spinal deformity correction fell into disfavor due to the production of spinal cord injury and paraplegia created by the application of excessive distraction to the spine.
However, over the last three decades, with refinement in the knowledge of spinal anatomy and biomechanics, the concept of controlled axial traction has regained attention with the use of the Harrington outrigger, Cotrel traction, and halo traction.
In the next three posts I will outline the 3 most
commonly-applied techniques of spinal traction currently in use:
- Preoperative halo-gravity
traction
- Intraoperative
halo-femoral traction
- Internal “dis-traction” technique (Table 1).
The
below table highlights the strengths and weaknesses of each type of traction we
will discuss in the upcoming blog posts……..
|
Strengths |
Weaknesses |
Preoperative Halo-gravity |
1. Permits gradual application of
traction 2. Correction while patient is
awake 3. Low risk of neurologic
problems |
1. Requires weeks or months of
continuous, daily treatment 2. Pin site issues 3. Contraindicated for cervical
and occipito-cervical instability |
Intraoperative Halo-femoral |
1. Preoperative hospitalization
unnecessary 2. Can easily adjust traction
force to achieve desired correction 3. Improves pelvic obliquity 4. Decreases operative time |
1. Additional operative time for
halo application and traction pin insertion with scarring 2. Contraindicated for cervical
or occipito-cervical instability 3. Relative contraindication with
kyphotic deformity |
Internal Dis-traction |
1. No external force application |
1. Shorter-term application of
traction; less stress relaxation and creep |
No comments:
Post a Comment